Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Review-"Casino Royale" (2006)

Breaking Bonds

Is it that good?
Short answer: yes.
Is
he
that good?
Yeah. He's the best thing about it. There are other good things as well, but let's look at Bond 6.0.

Not conventionally handsome, not the Arrow-shirt version of Bond, Craig has a multi-planed face that's great to watch whether it's jammed up against a shattered bathroom mirror considering just how much pressure it's going to take to strangle an assailant* or, half-a-movie later in another bathroom mirror, clearly satisfied with himself in a newly-tailored tuxedo jacket. His acting choices are subtle, nicely measured. His atypical look is just one of the many breaks from the past in a series that has not only embraced cliches, but luxuriated in them, and would even occasionally ham-string a promising entry to accomodate them (quite opposite from the early intentions of the producing team, which was to go against the grain of conventional thrillers--something not to far afield from Fleming's literary intentions--and surpass them, and in that regard, "Casino Royale" is the first film since "Goldfinger" to actually improve on its source.) The films are, after all, about Bond, so you'd better have somebody interesting in the lead, and Craig's Bond, his face becoming criss-crossed with scars as the movie progresses, makes you care just how much of a toll the mission is taking on him, both physically and psychologically. When was the last time anybody gave a damn about James Bond's soul in the movies?

In this "reboot" the cliches are dusted off, their origins shown and exposed for the good ideas they once were. The stunts and longish action sequences are still there, but they're used, at their best, to expose character.** There are gadgets, but nothing you couldn't find in catalogs this Christmas (technology has long since caught up to Bond with cell-phones, GPS tracking and personal defibrillators). "The James Bond Theme" is merely hinted at in the body of the film and in the "Secret Agent Man"-ish title song*** (growled by home-boy Chris Cornell), saved for the end with a fully formed (for good and ill) Bond.

As good as Craig is, he's matched by his co-stars. Mads Mikkelson as LeChiffre has a nice, oily quality to him, and certainly projects the most danger to Bond since Robert Shaw's Red Grant (in "From Russia With Love"), The only cast member retained (so far) from the Brosnan films is Dame Judi Dench, whose "M" is finally given the authoritative role over Bond that Bernard Lee once had, rather than seeming like Bond's subordinate.

And the Bond-"girls?" Well, there is Ivana Milicevic, who's there mostly for decoration. But Caterina Murino certainly can act, and brings a nice world-weary resignation to the role as a terrorist's wife out for some revenge. But the revelation here is Eva Green, who's Vesper Lynd manages to flesh out the cypher that Fleming created. A mystery in the book, Green conveys a genuine human being, and her scenes with Craig are some of the best written exchanges(and are cracklingly well delivered)in the series, and includes one heart-breaker of a scene, after a brutal fight in a stairwell. It's so moving and so well-done that it's surprising to see it in a Bond movie.

And that's the thing: there has always been a great deal of disparity between what constitutes a "Good James Bond Movie" and a genuinely "Good Movie." And this is a "Good Movie"...which happens to have James Bond in it...that can stand as a fine drama, AS WELL AS holding its own in the adventure/action aisle. I didn't cringe at a performance or roll my eyes at a joke once and if there was one thing I was dissatisfied with it might be the small amount of screen-time given to Jeffrey Wright...and maybe tweak the ending a bit. Credit the writers (regulars Purvis and Wade and the ubiquitous Paul Haggis), the director (Martin Campbell, who did "Edge of Darkness") and super-editor Stuart Baird. This is going to be a fun one to watch slowed down on DVD. Oh, and "Cubby" Broccoli's kids, who followed up one of the most profitable movies in the series (the loud, obnoxious video-gamer "Die Another Day") with this. Talk about gambling....

"Casino Royale"(2006) is a Full-Price Ticket to be chased by a large tumbler of Scotch and a warm, comforting shower

* Oh, did I say "strangled?" There's a lot of very brutal violence in this movie (not just card-playing in tuxedoes)that managed to skirt by with an inexplicable PG-13 Rating, including a scene where Bond is stripped naked, tied to a seat-less chair, and has his testicles beaten with a very heavy, very gnarly knotted rope--a scene that should send any 13 year old boy running for the bathroom. This is not the clean "one-shot/no-blood" violence of past Bonds. Here the violence is fast, painful brutish and bloody. Be warned.

** There is a wonderful moment when Bond has just (barely) foiled an attempt at industrial espionage, where he cocks his head, exhausted, at the untouched target and quietly marvels at what he's done.

***The title sequence is also unique--gone are the writhing go-go girls--but should delight anyone who grew up with the imaginative main titles of many a 60's spy series.

4 comments:

John said...

While much shorter, and less elegant, my own review of Casino Royale seems to be largely in agreement with yours.

"Yojimbo_5" said...

Much shorter? Yes.
Less elegant? I find brevity more elegant, probably because I'm incapable of it, so I'd argue that point.
I saw your review, noted your cribbing of my Steve McQueen reference (good taste, there, JB), and proceeded with my opus (3 drafts/2 viewings while dealing with career set-backs and PBD (Post-Bond-Depression "That's it? I have to wait another 2-3 years?").
Saw a box-set at Costco last night called "The Ultimate Bond Collection" and looking at the contents felt they should recall it and just put one out that has "Dr. No," "From Russia With Love," "Goldfinger," and "Casino Royale."
For the last many, many films I've been going to opening weekends of these things with a small clutch of male friends who, like me, know better than to inflict these movies on their wives. I'd be curious to see what the distaff audience think of this one.
I know you didn't like the song much, but after some pretty mordant ones lately, I liked the verve in this one, and it grew on me.
Wish John Barry were back for this one, though. He would have put an added shellacking of "class" to it.
Word verification was "ukssveui"--pretty appropriate for a Bond review comment.

"Yojimbo_5" said...

Just re-read your review.
The "Texas Hold 'em" thing? Yes...more familiar to audiences, certainly (Dalton's 2nd Bond was called "Licence Revoked" until a marketing survey showed most Americans didn't know what "revoked" meant!), but the poker angle requires more participation of the player, rather than Fleming's baccarat game, which depends purely on the luck of the draw. I found it an improvement for drama/character...

John said...

While not technically a wife, my sweetie Olaiya loved the new Bond film. She's a fan of all of them, and was unfazed by the grittier turn of direction. She said this ranks in the top few all time.