"Oh, Wasted 'Sleuth'"
"In Olden Days a Glimpse of Stocking Was Looked On as Something Shocking, now I suppose....Anything Goes"
"Sleuth" started out as a hit play by Anthony Shaffer. It was inevitable that a movie would be made of it, and in 1972, a spit-and-polished version of "Sleuth" hit the screen. Shaffer wrote the screen-play, and it was directed with a rich panache by Joseph L. Mankiewicz (who knew a thing or three about theatricality) and the cast could not be improved--top-lined by Sir Laurence Olivier as mystery writer Andrew Wyke, and Michael Caine as the London hair-dresser Milo Tindle, currently having an affair with Wyke's wife. Mankiewicz's film is devilish fun, a clash between The Old World and The Terminally Hip with the battleground being Wyke's gadget and gee-gaw filled Manor House (designed by Ken Adam). Add to it John Addison's frothy hapsichord score and however dark the film becomes (and Mankiewicz gives it a creepily saw-toothed edge), it is never less than fun to watch, especially seeing Olivier energetically dashing through each scene, precisely mimicking accents and dialects--a brilliant murderous man-child forever playing games and Caine keeping up, trotting warily behind. At the time, that theatricality and staging made everything seem a trifle--a little bon-bon for the rinse-set. But over time, one can't help admiring the energy brought to the fore by Mank and Olivier, defying age and frailty to knock another one out of the park. And Shaffer's play is filled with all sorts of opportunity to...play. It stands as definitive...a champion documentation of the play.
Good Authors too Who Once Knew Better Words, Now Only use Four Letter Words Writing Prose, Anything Goes.
It must have seemed such a good idea to re-do it. With Caine old enough to play the Wyke role, and who else but Jude Law as Tindle, making it "The Battle of the Alfies" (and if you think this is coincidence, a couple of lines makes it obvious it was uppermost in the film-maker's minds). Then, to adapt (at one point Wyke says, cheekily, "You know what the word 'adapt' means, don't you?"), the great Harold Pinter, and to direct, Kenneth Branagh, both men who can mine rich veins out of depleted quarry. And the result? "Sleuth" is still there in skeletal form--it's still Wyke vs. Tindle, but only one line of the original remains*--it's been completely stripped. The fussy old school mysteries Wyke wrote are gone, replaced by "crime novels" that regularly turn up on British telly, exemplified by sweating policemen grilling suspects. Milo's now an actor, who does hair, does the occasional chauffeur job. He plays "killers...sex-maniacs, perverts mostly." Not only is the dialog stripped down to essentials ( and in nice....short little...bursts), so is the attitude. Any veneer of civility from the play has been scraped away, starting in the first moments with the chilly pause before a hand-shake when the two men first meet. No, they start off scrapping and spitting at each other right from "Hello" using all manner of Anglo-Saxon terms for each other, mutual contempt hurled in both directions. Which tends to throw the rest of the play on shaky ground. I suppose the makers didn't think Caine could pull off a stuffy, fusty Brit, and made it two working-class toipes throwing knives between their two sets of blue eyes. It takes the class warfare sub-text completely out of the center of the thing, leaving it all to ring just a bit hollow. The play pretty much runs its course, but the Second Act is considerably shortened, and the Third Act, if you will, is dragged on and on (despite all this, new-"Sleuth" lasts 86 minutes--the first was 2 hr, 18 m-- but seems longer) All this is staged in a hi-tech sterile interior (Wyke had nothing to do with it, he claims which seems...odd). And although there's a lot of bantering and word-play, sometimes annoyingly non-sequitir, it's just NO fun at all. Not a jot. At the end of the original, there is the satisfying finish with two simultaneous wails, along with mocking laughter. Then a curtain comes down. Here, nothing. Silence. Not even the impulse to applaud.
"Sleuth" (1972) is a strong matinee.
"Sleuth" (2007) is a waste of time.
* "The shortest way to a man's heart is humiliation."
2 comments:
Didn't Caine make his mark, pre-Alfie, playing an upper-class officer in _Zulu_? And isn't he currently drawing a paycheck as Alfred in the new Batman franchise? Why on earth would someone think he can only play working class?
Where to begin? This "Sleuth" is such a mis-fire. Pinter never saw the first movie--never saw the play. They gave him the script, and he started work. I think, what they were doing (and I have no idea!) was that they were trying to "update" "Sleuth"--to make a version of it 40 years on, reflecting changes in Britain. So, the old mystery-writers have been replaced with procedural-makers, and that Victorian-era architecture is gutted and replaced with sleek, sterile tech (nice metaphor for the movie itself). There are no puzzles, no intellectual stimulation, just blunt strategy and castrating power plays--so it's a Frankenstein mutation of "Sleuth" and "The Caretaker." So, it's not even "Sleuth," really. Why call it that? Maybe Branagh and Pinter thought they were just too clever for all that. And unfortunately, instead of great dialogue, you get these two fine (Caine = great, Law = serviceable)actors circling around calling each other "c**ts."
Where's the cleverness in that? So, why call it "Sleuth?" I've got a title! "Lost in the Pinter-lands."
Post a Comment